post detail page top

Vibrant Technik

Failures of Building Facades

By:

Building envelope and along with it facade engineering is evolving with creative designs and new building materials to cope with aspirational designers and educated building owners. More emphasis is being given to the humble facade with rising awareness amongst the building owners and developers in order to create value which was long lost and to extend the life of the buildings and finishes. However during the process of these creations one witnesses a number of experiences where failures and poor performances are evident which upsets the designers and the owners/creators. This article aims to share a few real time experiences of failures covering several facets of the issue.

Etiology of Façade Failures

façade failures

Various manifestations of façade failure
fig.2 Various manifestations of façade failure

Generally failures are attributed to several aspects and it is highly unlikely that a single factor would result in facade failure. Facade elements are combinations of several materials combined together in a specific build-able form that is integrated as the building envelope. During the complete process from design to implementation, there are various steps that are involved. Each process has to be handled with utmost care and precision by specific teams adept in the respective skill.

Hence, the failure etiology is quite complex. In many situations findings from the failure investigations are highly challenging and it’s difficult to conclude the primary cause.

Table 1 presented here illustrates critical aspects of the process which help in identifying the failure analogy. It also represents the level of risks associated with the aspects and its impact on the finished building facades.

Types of Façade Failures

Following is the explanation of some of the major aspects varying from design, materials, structural and integration that culminate into facade failure.

Aspects of failures

Failure of glazing panel bracket
fig 3 – Failure of glazing panel bracket
Possible Causes: Panels stacked one above another | No vertical movement allowance

~ Structural
~ Pertaining to material
~ Incorrect design and detailing
~ Implementation
~ Integration
~ Underestimating complexity
~ Ignoring building behavior
~ Poor Integration with buildings

Structural Failures

Stone Cladding façade failure
fig 4- Failure of stone cladding panels | fig 5- Failure of stone at soffit fixing

Generally result from the following major reasons:

Fire on Aluminium Composite Cladding Panels
fig 6- Fire on aluminium composite cladding panels
Possible causes: Incorrect material specification, i.e., combustible materials used | Cladding panels are not fire resistant | No vertical separations

Incorrect design
Underestimating building behavior
Complex and impractical designs
Poor implementations

These failures will have serious impact on the facades and may pose safety issues in front of the occupants.

Material Failures

These failures often cause major disruption in building services and life safety. Major factors resulting in material failures are listed below:

~ Incorrect materials
~ Ignored long term performance
~ Unknown life cycle
~ Not suitable for a particular weather
~ Premature due to local conditions

Material and finish generally undergo premature degradation resulting in alteration of life cycle and incur significant replacement cost. Failures are generally attributed to the aspects such as compatibility, weather exposure, etc.

Glass & Glazing Failures fig 7- Failure of glazing sealant | fig 8- Finish Failure | fig 9- Glass breakage

Glass Failures

fig 10- Edge defamination | fig 11- Visual distortion
fig 10- Edge defamination | fig 11- Visual distortion

Glass failures generally result from the following key aspects. Following images shows some classic failure patterns.

Nature of Failures & Non-compliance of Glass

~ Structural
~ poor processing
~ In appropriate specification
~ Poor performances
~ Inherent material characteristics

Images 8-12 show some classic glass failure patterns

Managing Glass

Anisotropic patters
fig 12- Anisotropic patters

Glass is often complex and requires good experience with specialist skills in order to meet the expectations. Visual non-conformities are generally considered as non-compliance rather than failures. Following are tabled out some key aspects to note.

Implementation Failures

Failures during the implementation are primarily combined effect of several teams not working in tandem. Few key aspects are presented below:

Inappropriate design:

~ Design not suitable to site condition
~ Poorly designed details
~ Incorrect dimensions

façade failure

fig 12- Anchorage- missing substrate
fig 12- Anchorage- missing substrate

Incorrect site sequences:

~ Poorly planned work flow
~ Mixed sequences of different trades

Site modifications:

~ Prefabricated parts modified at site to suit site conditions
~ Tolerances are out of control

Poor coordination and site management

façade failure

~ Miscommunications between the teams
~ III prepared for the site conditions
~ Unclear responsibilities among team

Missing quality management

~ Dedicated quality-checks are missing
~ Systematic checking procedures not in place.

Integration/Interfacing Failures

Inadequacies during the interfacing stage and integration with the main building have a major impact on resultant functionality resulting in failures ultimately. Few key aspects are tabled.

Conclusion

façade failure prevention
Management System

Failures generally surface as a result of a combination of several factors, right from design to implementation. Often the tracking of failure is not an easy and pleasant task as it deals with finding faults at several stages and a lot of stake-holders are involved. Hence it is essential that adequate level of management systems is in place to avoid potential risks of building façade failures.

Rajan Govind

Director, Façade Specialist

Rajan Govind has 25 years of international experience within the façade industry, out of which he has served more than 11 years at Arup. With structural engineering background, he has good overall façade specialist experience. He has gained working experience in various regions such as Asia, the Middle East and Australia. He has successfully delivered several prestigious projects with integrated façade designs, involving 3D design, complex engineering and building integration. Rajan Govind is a Certified SGMM (Singapore Green Mark Manager), which enables him to understand sustainable design requirements from architectural and practical perspectives. He has technically lead, managed and delivered several large projects with highly practical and efficient designs resulted successful implementations.

home page below category

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.